Frequently Asked Questions

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) is an independent European body, which contributes to the consistent application of data protection rules throughout the European Union, and promotes cooperation between the EU’s data protection authorities (DPAs), as well as the DPAs of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (the European Economic Area or EEA).

All documents adopted during the EDPB Plenary are subject to the necessary legal, linguistic and formatting checks and will be made available on the EDPB website once these have been completed.

Once published, recently adopted documents will be listed under “latest publications” on the main page of this website.

You can also find overviews of the documents adopted per plenary on the EDPB news page.

The EDPB brings together the EU DPAs and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). The EEA EFTA countries (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) are also members with regard to GDPR-related matters and without the rights to vote and to be elected as chair or deputy chair. The European Commission and - with regard to GDPR-related matters - the EFTA Surveillance Authority have the right to participate in the activities and meetings of the Board without voting rights.

You can find an overview of the EEA DPAs here.

As addressees of the EDPB decisions, the relevant Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) that wish to challenge these decisions can bring an action for annulment before the European Court of Justice (CJEU) within two months of being notified.

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) is a Member of the European Data Protection Board. In addition, the EDPS provides the EDPB Secretariat. The Secretariat offers administrative and logistic support to the EDPB, performs analytical work and contributes to the EDPB’s tasks.

Although staff at the Secretariat is employed by the EDPS, staff members only work under the instructions of the Chair of the EDPB.

The terms of cooperation between the EDPB and the EDPS are established by the Memorandum of Understanding.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires the Data Protection Authority (DPA) of the European Economic Area (EEA) to cooperate closely - under the umbrella of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) - to ensure the consistent application of the GDPR and the protection of individuals’ data protection rights across the EEA. One of their tasks is to coordinate decision-making in cross-border data processing cases.
A processing is cross-border when:

• data processing takes place in more than one country;
• or it substantially affects or it is likely to substantially affect individuals in more than one country.

Under the so-called one-stop-shop mechanism Art. 60 GDPR, the Lead Supervisory Authority (LSA) acts as the main point of contact for the controller or processor for a given processing, while the Concerned Supervisory Authorities (CSAs) act as the main point of contact for individuals in the territory of their Member State. The LSA is the authority in charge of leading the cooperation process. It will share relevant information with the CSAs, carry out the investigations, prepare the draft decision relating to the case, and cooperate with the other CSAs in an endeavour to reach consensus on this draft decision.

If you believe your data protection rights have been violated you can contact the organisation holding your data, contact your national data protection authority (DPA), or go to a national court.

DPAs can conduct investigations and impose sanctions where necessary. You can find the contact details for all EEA DPAs here.

While Art. 65 (a) and (b) relate to the one-stop-mechanism, Art.65.1 (c) GDPR concerns obligations of Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) stemming from the consistency mechanism.

More specifically, every competent DPA has the duty to request an opinion from the EDPB before adopting national measures pursuant to article 64.1 GDPR. Such measures include lists of processing operations for which a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is required, or the approval of a new set of standard clauses. In addition, under Art. 64.2 GDPR, any SA may also request an EDPB consistency opinion on any matter of general application or producing effects in more than one Member State.

If an DPA does not request the opinion of the EDPB for the cases listed under Art. 64.1 GDPR or does not follow the EDPB opinion issued under Art. 64 GDPR, any DPA and the European Commission can launch the dispute resolution procedure of Art. 65.1 (c) GDPR about the matter.

Within one month from the referral of the subject matter, the EDPB must adopt a decision by a two-thirds majority. 

The one-month deadline to adopt this binding decision can be extended by another month, if the case is complex. When the EDPB is not able to reach a decision within the abovementioned period, the decision must be adopted by a simple majority within two additional weeks. Should the members of the EDPB be split, the decision will be adopted by the vote of the EDPB Chair.

Once the EDPB has adopted a binding decision, the EDPB Chair notifies the binding decision to the relevant national Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) without undue delay.

Prior to the notification, the binding decision is translated into the languages of the relevant national DPAs that have to adopt a final decision or take measures at national level on the basis of the binding decision¹. Translation and proofreading can take a few weeks. In any case, the English version of the decision is the only authentic language version.

Next step for the relevant  Data Protection Authorities (DPAs)

Once the relevant SAs have been notified of the binding decision, a decision has to be adopted at national level to implement the content of the binding decision. This decision will be adopted without undue delay and at the latest one month after the EDPB has notified its decision.
For cross-border cases where no consensus was found (Art. 65.1 (a) GDPR), the final decision will be addressed to the controller or processor and, where relevant, to the complainant.

1. Please see paragraphs 6 and 7 of Art. 11 of the EDPB Rules of Procedure. In exceptional cases, other Concerned Supervisory Authority (CSAs) can request, providing the reasons, an urgent translation in their official EU language(s) no later than at the moment of adoption of the binding decision.