Search results | European Data Protection Board

EDPBI:DE:OSS:D:2020:162

Final One Stop Shop Decision

11 Listopad 2020

DE SA (Hessen)

dehe_2020-11_personal_data_breach_decisionpublic_redacted.pdf

PDF, 437.42 KB

Download dehe_2020-11_personal_data_breach_decisionpublic_redacted.pdf

dehe_2020-11_personal_data_breach_summarypublic.pdf

PDF, 562.9 KB

Download dehe_2020-11_personal_data_breach_summarypublic.pdf

Main legal reference

Article 32 (Security of processing)

Article 33 (Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority)

Article 34 (Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject)

Relevant topics

Outcome

No violation

EDPBI:RO:OSS:D:2020:163

Final One Stop Shop Decision

08 Říjen 2020

ro_2020-12_final_decision_redacted.pdf

PDF, 560.99 KB

Download ro_2020-12_final_decision_redacted.pdf

ro_2020-11_right_to_erasure_consent_summarypublic.pdf

PDF, 561.77 KB

Download ro_2020-11_right_to_erasure_consent_summarypublic.pdf

CSA

Main legal reference

Article 17 (Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’))

Article 7 (Conditions for consent)

Article 6 (Lawfulness of processing)

Relevant topics

Outcome

Reprimand

Overview on resources made available by Member States to the Data Protection Authorities and on enforcement actions by the Data Protection Authorities

Go to Overview on resources made available by Member States to the Data Protection Authorities and on enforcement actions by the Data Protection Authorities

EDPB response to MEP Sophie in’t Veld regarding the use of Automatic Image Recognition System on migrants in Italy

Go to EDPB response to MEP Sophie in’t Veld regarding the use of Automatic Image Recognition System on migrants in Italy

Opinion 31/2021 on the draft decision of the Spanish Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of the COLT Group

Go to Opinion 31/2021 on the draft decision of the Spanish Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of the COLT Group

Opinion 27/2021 on the draft decision of the Supervisory Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of the Internet Initiative Japan Group

Go to Opinion 27/2021 on the draft decision of the Supervisory Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of the Internet Initiative Japan Group

Opinion 30/2021 on the draft decision of the Spanish Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the COLT Group

Go to Opinion 30/2021 on the draft decision of the Spanish Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the COLT Group

Opinion 28/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of Oregon Tool, Inc (formerly “Blount”)

Go to Opinion 28/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of Oregon Tool, Inc (formerly “Blount”)

Opinion 26/2021 on the draft decision of the Supervisory Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Internet Initiative Japan Group

Go to Opinion 26/2021 on the draft decision of the Supervisory Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Internet Initiative Japan Group

Opinion 29/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of Oregon Tool, Inc (Formerly “Blount”)

Go to Opinion 29/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of Oregon Tool, Inc (Formerly “Blount”)

Select your language

Hledat