Documents

The EDPB provides guidance, binding decisions, opinions legal advice to ensure consistent application of data protection rules across Europe.

  • 548 results found for: ‘GDPR Guidelines Recommendations Best Practice’
RSS Feed
Filter on
Filter on type
Filter on topic
Reset filters

Opinion 27/2020 on the draft decision of the Danish Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of Coloplast Group

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Binding Corporate Rules #Tools for transfers and derogations
Read more about
Opinion 27/2020 on the draft decision of the Danish Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of Coloplast Group

Guidelines 06/2022 on the practical implementation of amicable settlements

Guideline
Read more about
Guidelines 06/2022 on the practical implementation of amicable settlements

Opinion 20/2018 on the draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Sweden regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR)

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Data protection impact assessment
Read more about
Opinion 20/2018 on the draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Sweden regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR)

Opinion 29/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of Oregon Tool, Inc (Formerly “Blount”)

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Binding Corporate Rules #Tools for transfers and derogations
Read more about
Opinion 29/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of Oregon Tool, Inc (Formerly “Blount”)

Opinion 26/2021 on the draft decision of the Supervisory Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Internet Initiative Japan Group

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Binding Corporate Rules #Tools for transfers and derogations
Read more about
Opinion 26/2021 on the draft decision of the Supervisory Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Internet Initiative Japan Group

Guidelines 09/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679

Guideline
Final version
#Cooperation between authorities
Read more about
Guidelines 09/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679

Opinion 16/2023 on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Informatica Group

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Binding Corporate Rules #Tools for transfers and derogations
Read more about
Opinion 16/2023 on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Informatica Group

Opinion 18/2026 on the draft decision of the Dutch Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Rubrik Group

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Binding Corporate Rules #Tools for transfers and derogations
Read more about
Opinion 18/2026 on the draft decision of the Dutch Supervisory Authority regarding the Controller Binding Corporate Rules of the Rubrik Group

Opinion 3/2024 on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of the Accenture Group

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)
#Binding Corporate Rules #Tools for transfers and derogations
Read more about
Opinion 3/2024 on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding the Processor Binding Corporate Rules of the Accenture Group

Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation - version adopted after public consultation

Guideline
Final version
#Certification
Read more about
Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation - version adopted after public consultation